LeetCopilot Logo
LeetCopilot
LeetCode Pattern/Two Pointers/The Off-by-One Trap in Two Pointers: How to Get Pointer Bounds Right Every Time

The Off-by-One Trap in Two Pointers: How to Get Pointer Bounds Right Every Time

LeetCopilot Team
Dec 9, 2025
10 min read
Two PointersDebuggingCommon MistakesEdge CasesInterview Prep
Off-by-one errors in two pointers solutions cause subtle bugs that pass most test cases but fail edge cases. Learn the systematic approach to correct pointer initialization, loop bounds, and window size calculation.

Your two pointers solution works perfectly on the example test cases. You submit with confidence.

Runtime Error. Or worse: Wrong Answer on test case 47/52.

You debug for 20 minutes. The issue? Your left pointer started at 1 instead of 0. Or you calculated window size as right - left instead of right - left + 1. Or your loop condition was left <= right when it should have been left < right.

Off-by-one errors are the silent killers of two pointers solutions. They're subtle, hard to spot, and often only appear on edge cases like empty arrays, single elements, or when pointers meet.

This guide will teach you a systematic approach to avoid off-by-one errors in two pointers problems, covering initialization, loop bounds, window size calculation, and edge case handling.

TL;DR

  • Always initialize pointers consistently: left = 0, right = n - 1 for opposite direction
  • Use left < right for opposite direction (not <= unless you want to process the same element)
  • Window size is right - left + 1 when both pointers are inclusive
  • Test edge cases: empty array, single element, two elements, all same values
  • Document your invariants: write comments about what left and right represent

The Three Sources of Off-by-One Errors

1. Incorrect Pointer Initialization

2. Wrong Loop Condition

3. Incorrect Window Size Calculation

Let's tackle each one systematically.

Source 1: Incorrect Pointer Initialization

The Standard Patterns

Opposite Direction (Converging Pointers):

python
left = 0           # First element
right = len(nums) - 1  # Last element

Same Direction (Fast/Slow or Read/Write):

python
slow = 0
fast = 0  # or fast = 1, depending on problem

Fixed-Size Window:

python
left = 0
right = k - 1  # Window of size k

Common Mistakes

Mistake 1: Starting right at len(nums)

python
# WRONG
right = len(nums)  # This is out of bounds!

# CORRECT
right = len(nums) - 1

Why it's wrong: Arrays are 0-indexed. If nums = [1, 2, 3], valid indices are 0, 1, 2. Index 3 is out of bounds.

Mistake 2: Starting left at 1

python
# WRONG (unless you have a specific reason)
left = 1

# CORRECT
left = 0

Why it's wrong: You skip the first element, missing potential valid answers.

Edge Case: Empty Array

Always check for empty arrays before initializing pointers:

python
def twoSum(nums, target):
    if not nums:  # or: if len(nums) == 0
        return []
    
    left, right = 0, len(nums) - 1
    # ... rest of logic

Without this check, right = len(nums) - 1 becomes -1 for an empty array, causing unexpected behavior.

Source 2: Wrong Loop Condition

The loop condition determines when your pointers stop. Getting this wrong causes you to either skip valid pairs or process the same element twice.

Opposite Direction: `left < right` vs `left <= right`

Use left < right when you're looking for pairs (two different elements):

python
# Finding pairs (e.g., Two Sum, Valid Palindrome)
while left < right:
    # Process nums[left] and nums[right]
    # These are always different elements

Use left <= right when you're processing individual elements and it's okay to process the middle element:

python
# Binary search (processing individual elements)
while left <= right:
    mid = (left + right) // 2
    # Process nums[mid]

Why the Difference?

Example: nums = [1, 2, 3], looking for a pair that sums to 5.

With left < right:

  • Iteration 1: left=0, right=2 → sum = 1+3 = 4
  • Iteration 2: left=1, right=2 → sum = 2+3 = 5 ✓
  • Loop ends when left=2, right=2 (not executed)

With left <= right (WRONG for pairs):

  • Iteration 1: left=0, right=2 → sum = 1+3 = 4
  • Iteration 2: left=1, right=2 → sum = 2+3 = 5 ✓
  • Iteration 3: left=2, right=2 → sum = 3+3 = 6 (using same element twice!)

Same Direction: When to Stop

For same-direction pointers, the fast pointer usually determines the loop:

python
# Fast/Slow pattern
while fast < len(nums):
    # Process
    fast += 1

# Or for linked lists
while fast and fast.next:
    slow = slow.next
    fast = fast.next.next

Source 3: Incorrect Window Size Calculation

This is the most common off-by-one error in two pointers problems.

The Rule: Inclusive Endpoints

When both left and right are inclusive (pointing to valid elements in the window):

python
window_size = right - left + 1

Why the +1?

Example: nums = [10, 20, 30, 40], left = 1, right = 3

The window contains: [20, 30, 40] (indices 1, 2, 3)

  • Number of elements: 3
  • Calculation: right - left + 1 = 3 - 1 + 1 = 3

Without the +1:

  • right - left = 3 - 1 = 2 ✗ (wrong!)

Visual Proof

code
Indices:  0    1    2    3
Values:  [10, 20, 30, 40]
          ^         ^
        left      right

Elements in window: 20, 30, 40
Count: 3

Formula: right - left + 1 = 3 - 1 + 1 = 3 ✓

Edge Case: Single Element Window

When left == right:

python
# left = 2, right = 2
window_size = 2 - 2 + 1 = 1  # Correct!

The window contains one element, which is correct.

Systematic Checklist for Correct Bounds

Before you submit your two pointers solution, run through this checklist:

✅ Initialization Checklist

  • Empty array check: Do I handle len(nums) == 0?
  • Opposite direction: Is left = 0 and right = len(nums) - 1?
  • Same direction: Are both pointers starting at valid positions?
  • Fixed window: Is right = k - 1 for window size k?

✅ Loop Condition Checklist

  • Pairs: Am I using left < right (not <=)?
  • Individual elements: Am I using left <= right only when appropriate?
  • Fast pointer: Is my condition fast < len(nums) (not <=)?

✅ Window Size Checklist

  • Inclusive endpoints: Am I using right - left + 1?
  • Single element: Does my formula give 1 when left == right?

✅ Edge Case Checklist

  • Empty array: nums = []
  • Single element: nums = [5]
  • Two elements: nums = [1, 2]
  • All same: nums = [3, 3, 3, 3]

Example: Valid Palindrome (Correct Implementation)

Let's apply these principles to a classic problem:

python
def isPalindrome(s: str) -> bool:
    # Clean the string
    cleaned = ''.join(c.lower() for c in s if c.isalnum())
    
    # Edge case: empty or single character
    if len(cleaned) <= 1:
        return True
    
    # Initialize pointers (opposite direction)
    left = 0
    right = len(cleaned) - 1  # NOT len(cleaned)
    
    # Loop while pointers haven't met
    while left < right:  # NOT <=
        if cleaned[left] != cleaned[right]:
            return False
        left += 1
        right -= 1
    
    return True

Why this is correct:

  1. ✅ Handles empty string and single character
  2. right = len(cleaned) - 1 (not out of bounds)
  3. left < right (doesn't compare middle element to itself)
  4. ✅ Increments/decrements correctly

What Happens on Edge Cases?

Empty string: cleaned = ""

  • len(cleaned) = 0 <= 1 → returns True

Single character: cleaned = "a"

  • len(cleaned) = 1 <= 1 → returns True

Two characters (palindrome): cleaned = "aa"

  • left=0, right=1, cleaned[0] == cleaned[1] → returns True

Two characters (not palindrome): cleaned = "ab"

  • left=0, right=1, cleaned[0] != cleaned[1] → returns False

Example: Container With Most Water (Off-by-One Trap)

python
def maxArea(height: List[int]) -> int:
    if len(height) < 2:
        return 0
    
    left, right = 0, len(height) - 1
    max_area = 0
    
    while left < right:
        # Width calculation (common mistake: forgetting the distance)
        width = right - left  # NOT right - left + 1
        
        # Height is the minimum of the two
        h = min(height[left], height[right])
        
        # Area calculation
        area = width * h
        max_area = max(max_area, area)
        
        # Move the shorter line
        if height[left] < height[right]:
            left += 1
        else:
            right -= 1
    
    return max_area

Key insight: Width is right - left (not +1) because we're measuring the distance between the two lines, not counting elements in a window.

Example: left=0, right=3

  • Distance between positions 0 and 3 is 3 units
  • Formula: 3 - 0 = 3

Common Patterns and Their Correct Bounds

Pattern 1: Two Sum (Sorted Array)

python
left, right = 0, len(nums) - 1
while left < right:  # Not <=
    current_sum = nums[left] + nums[right]
    if current_sum == target:
        return [left, right]
    elif current_sum < target:
        left += 1
    else:
        right -= 1

Pattern 2: Remove Duplicates (Same Direction)

python
if not nums:
    return 0

write = 1  # Start at 1, not 0
for read in range(1, len(nums)):  # Start at 1
    if nums[read] != nums[read - 1]:
        nums[write] = nums[read]
        write += 1

return write  # This is the new length

Pattern 3: Longest Substring (Sliding Window)

python
left = 0
max_length = 0

for right in range(len(s)):
    # Add s[right] to window
    
    while window_invalid():
        # Remove s[left] from window
        left += 1
    
    # Update max length
    max_length = max(max_length, right - left + 1)  # +1 for inclusive

Debugging Off-by-One Errors

When your solution fails on edge cases, add debug prints:

python
while left < right:
    print(f"left={left}, right={right}, window_size={right-left+1}")
    print(f"values: nums[{left}]={nums[left]}, nums[{right}]={nums[right]}")
    # ... your logic

Look for:

  • Pointers going out of bounds (negative or >= len)
  • Pointers crossing when they shouldn't
  • Window size being 0 or negative
  • Same element being processed twice

Practice Strategy

To master pointer bounds:

  1. Solve Valid Palindrome (#125) - practice opposite direction with left < right
  2. Solve Remove Duplicates (#26) - practice same direction with read/write pointers
  3. Solve Container With Most Water (#11) - practice width calculation
  4. Manually trace edge cases - empty, single element, two elements
  5. Use LeetCopilot's execution trace to visualize pointer movement

FAQ

Q: Should I use left < right or left <= right?

A: For pairs (two different elements), use left < right. For individual element processing (like binary search), use left <= right.

Q: Why is window size right - left + 1 and not just right - left?

A: Because both left and right are inclusive indices. If left=2 and right=2, the window contains 1 element, not 0.

Q: How do I handle empty arrays?

A: Always add an early return: if not nums: return [] or if len(nums) == 0: return 0.

Q: What if my pointers need to cross?

A: For most two pointers problems, pointers shouldn't cross. If they do, you've likely found your answer or determined no solution exists.

Q: How do I know if I have an off-by-one error?

A: Your solution fails on edge cases (empty, single element, two elements) or gives wrong window sizes. Add debug prints to trace pointer values.

Conclusion

Off-by-one errors in two pointers are preventable with a systematic approach:

  1. Initialize correctly: left = 0, right = len(nums) - 1
  2. Choose the right loop condition: left < right for pairs
  3. Calculate window size correctly: right - left + 1 for inclusive endpoints
  4. Test edge cases: empty, single element, two elements
  5. Document your invariants: comment what each pointer represents

Key takeaways:

  • Always use len(nums) - 1 for the right pointer, never len(nums)
  • Use left < right for pair-finding problems
  • Window size with inclusive endpoints is right - left + 1
  • Test edge cases before submitting

Master these principles, and off-by-one errors will become a thing of the past. For more on two pointers patterns, see the complete guide and opposite direction template.

Next time you write left = 0, you'll know exactly why—and you'll get it right the first time.

Want to Practice LeetCode Smarter?

LeetCopilot is a free browser extension that enhances your LeetCode practice with AI-powered hints, personalized study notes, and realistic mock interviews — all designed to accelerate your coding interview preparation.

Also compatible with Edge, Brave, and Opera

Related Tutorials