I've done coding interviews in Python, Java, and C++. I've also interviewed candidates who used all three. Here's what I learned: your language choice matters less than you think, but the wrong choice can still hurt you.
The internet is full of debates about this. "Python is too slow!" "Java is too verbose!" "C++ shows you're a real programmer!"
After 50+ interviews on both sides of the table, here's the honest truth: Python is the best default choice for 80% of candidates. But your specific situation might call for something else.
If you're not sure what to use:
Python. It's the most forgiving, has the cleanest syntax, and lets you focus on problem-solving instead of fighting the language.
If you already know Java well and don't know Python:
Stick with Java. The time cost of learning Python syntax mid-prep isn't worth it. Java works fine for interviews.
If you're interviewing for systems/embedded roles:
C++ may be expected. Check the job description. For general SWE roles, Python or Java is fine.
If you're interviewing at a Java shop (finance, enterprise):
Java shows alignment with their stack. But Python still works.
If you do competitive programming:
C++ if that's what you're fast in. Speed matters in contests; clarity matters in interviews.
Don't:
| Factor | Python | Java | C++ | JavaScript |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best For | Most candidates | Java-heavy companies | Systems roles, CP | Frontend roles |
| Code Length | Shortest | Longer | Longest | Medium |
| Interview Speed | Fastest to write | Slower | Slowest | Fast |
| Error Prone | Least | Medium | Most | Medium |
| FAANG Preference | ✅ Accepted everywhere | ✅ Accepted everywhere | ✅ Accepted everywhere | ⚠️ Some limitations |
| Learning Curve | Easiest | Medium | Hardest | Easy |
| Built-in DS | Excellent | Good | Manual | Good |
| My Recommendation | Default choice | If you know it well | If required/CP background | Only if frontend role |
Here's the same "Two Sum" solution in three languages:
Python (5 lines):
def twoSum(nums, target):
seen = {}
for i, n in enumerate(nums):
if target - n in seen:
return [seen[target - n], i]
seen[n] = iJava (12 lines):
public int[] twoSum(int[] nums, int target) {
Map<Integer, Integer> seen = new HashMap<>();
for (int i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
int complement = target - nums[i];
if (seen.containsKey(complement)) {
return new int[] {seen.get(complement), i};
}
seen.put(nums[i], i);
}
return new int[] {};
}C++ (14 lines):
vector<int> twoSum(vector<int>& nums, int target) {
unordered_map<int, int> seen;
for (int i = 0; i < nums.size(); i++) {
int complement = target - nums[i];
if (seen.find(complement) != seen.end()) {
return {seen[complement], i};
}
seen[nums[i]] = i;
}
return {};
}The math:
In a 45-minute interview, that difference adds up. Less typing = more time to think about the actual problem.
Python's built-in structures are interview-optimized:
| Operation | Python | Java | C++ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Heap | heapq.heappush(h, x) | PriorityQueue (verbose) | priority_queue (verbose) |
| Counter | Counter(s) | Manual HashMap | Manual unordered_map |
| Deque | deque() built-in | ArrayDeque | deque (less clean) |
| Sorted container | sorted() one-liner | Collections.sort() | sort() |
| Default dict | defaultdict(list) | Manual initialization | Manual |
My experience:
When I solved problems in Python, I spent 5 minutes less per problem on boilerplate. Over 3-4 problems in an interview, that's 15-20 extra minutes for actually solving problems.
I've interviewed at Meta, Google, and Amazon. Not once did anyone comment on my language choice. What they cared about:
The myth: "Big companies prefer C++ because it shows you're a serious developer."
The reality: They care about problem-solving, not syntax knowledge. Use whatever lets you demonstrate that best.
The rule: Don't learn a new language during interview prep.
If you have 2+ years of Java experience and barely know Python, stick with Java. The time cost of learning Python syntax—and making newbie mistakes in interviews—isn't worth it.
How to decide:
Some companies have Java-centric stacks:
Using Java shows you're aligned with their tech stack. It's not required, but it's a small positive signal.
If you're interviewing for Android positions, Java (or Kotlin) makes sense. It shows role-specific knowledge.
What you give up:
What you gain:
For roles that explicitly require C++:
Using C++ demonstrates relevant skills. Python might raise eyebrows for a kernel developer role.
If you do competitive programming and C++ is your weapon:
But be aware: Interview C++ should be cleaner than CP C++. Use meaningful variable names, not single letters. Interviewers judge readability.
For some system design or optimization discussions, C++ knowledge is relevant. But this doesn't mean you should use C++ for coding problems.
What you give up:
What you gain:
My take: Use JavaScript only if interviewing for frontend roles at JavaScript-focused companies.
Where it works:
Where it's risky:
The limitation:
JavaScript lacks some built-in data structures that Python and Java have (no native heap, no TreeMap equivalent). You'd need to implement them manually or use workarounds.
Reality: Accepts Python, Java, C++, Go. No preference stated.
My experience: Used Python. No comments about language choice.
Reality: Accepts Python, Java, C++, JavaScript (for frontend).
My experience: Used Python. Interviewer was fine with it.
Reality: Accepts Python, Java, C++.
Common misconception: "Amazon prefers Java." This was true years ago. Now they're language-agnostic for SWE interviews.
Reality: Accepts Python, Java, C++, Swift (for iOS roles).
Note: For specific platform roles (iOS, macOS), Swift/Objective-C may be relevant.
Reality: Accepts Python, Java, C++, C#.
Note: C# is fine here given their stack, but Python still works.
Reality: Usually accept anything common.
Note: Using their actual tech stack (check job description) can be a small positive.
The bottom line:
No major tech company will reject you for using Python. The language debates are mostly internet noise.
What happens:
"I've been using Java, but I heard Python is better. Let me switch."
Why it's wrong:
You lose 2-3 weeks of muscle memory and make beginner mistakes in the new language during actual interviews.
The fix:
If you've solved 50+ problems in one language, stick with it. The time cost of switching isn't worth the marginal benefit.
What happens:
"I'll use Python because it's shorter" — but you have to Google basic syntax.
Why it's wrong:
Looking up "how to iterate through a list in Python" during an interview destroys your credibility.
The fix:
Use the language you know best, even if it's more verbose.
What happens:
"I'll use C++ to show I'm a serious developer."
Why it's wrong:
If you're not fast in C++, you'll spend extra time on syntax instead of problem-solving. Interviewers aren't impressed by language choice—they're impressed by clean solutions.
The fix:
Choose the language that lets you solve problems most clearly and quickly.
What happens:
Spending days researching "best interview language" instead of actually practicing.
Why it's wrong:
It matters way less than you think. Time spent debating is time not spent solving problems.
The fix:
Pick Python unless you have a specific reason not to. Move on. Practice.
Short answer: No.
I've never seen a candidate rejected for using Python. I've seen candidates rejected for messy code, wrong algorithms, and poor communication—never for language choice.
Short answer: Rarely matters in interviews.
Python's speed is fine for interview problem sizes (n ≤ 10^5 or 10^6). Time limits on LeetCode are set generously for Python. In real interviews, nobody times your code execution.
When it might matter:
Competitive programming contests with very tight time limits. Not relevant for job interviews.
Short answer: If you have time, yes. If you're interviewing in 2 weeks, no.
Timeline decision:
Short answer: It's fine.
Coding interviews test problem-solving, not language knowledge. You can learn a new language on the job. You can't learn problem-solving skills in a week.
Short answer: Don't.
Switching languages mid-interview looks disorganized. Pick one and stick with it.
After interviewing in multiple languages and seeing hundreds of candidates, here's my honest take:
Use Python if:
Use Java if:
Use C++ if:
Use JavaScript if:
Your language choice is responsible for maybe 5% of your interview success. The other 95%:
Spend less time debating languages. Spend more time solving problems.
Last updated: January 13, 2026. Based on personal interview experience (50+ interviews given and taken), observations from interviewing candidates in Python/Java/C++, and feedback from engineers at FAANG companies. Language preferences can vary by team; when in doubt, ask your recruiter.
LeetCopilot is a free browser extension that enhances your LeetCode practice with AI-powered hints, personalized study notes, and realistic mock interviews — all designed to accelerate your coding interview preparation.
Also compatible with Edge, Brave, and Opera
Add to Chrome for free