Educative vs AlgoMonster: I Compared Both for 30 Days (2026)
Pricing Note: Product prices mentioned in this article may vary due to promotions, discounts, or updates. Please check the official websites for current pricing.

Pricing Note: Product prices mentioned in this article may vary due to promotions, discounts, or updates. Please check the official websites for current pricing.
Educative and AlgoMonster are both pattern-based learning platforms—but they serve very different needs.
Educative is a comprehensive course platform with the famous "Grokking" series for both coding patterns and system design.
AlgoMonster is a focused DSA course teaching 48 patterns through interactive text and diagrams.
Which is right for you? After comparing both, here's what I found.
| Feature | Educative | AlgoMonster |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Coding + System Design | DSA Patterns Only |
| Content | 600+ courses | 48 patterns, 231 lessons |
| System Design | Excellent (Grokking SD) | Limited |
| Format | Interactive text | Interactive text |
| Pricing | ~$299/year | ~$89/yr or $99-150 lifetime |
| Best For | Senior engineers | DSA focus, beginners |
Educative is a comprehensive learning platform with interactive, text-based courses covering coding interviews, system design, and software engineering.
AlgoMonster is a focused DSA course created by ex-Google engineers, teaching 48 coding patterns through interactive lessons.
| Educative | AlgoMonster | |
|---|---|---|
| Patterns Taught | 26 (Grokking) | 48 |
| Problem Count | 500+ (across courses) | ~230 |
| Depth | Good | Excellent |
AlgoMonster wins for pure DSA pattern coverage with 48 explicit patterns vs. Educative's 26.
| Educative | AlgoMonster | |
|---|---|---|
| Coverage | Excellent | Limited |
| Course Quality | Industry-leading | Basic |
| Senior Prep | Complete | Needs supplements |
Educative dominates for system design. Grokking System Design is considered the gold standard.
If you're interviewing for senior roles, Educative is essential.
| Educative | AlgoMonster | |
|---|---|---|
| Format | Interactive text | Interactive text |
| Visualizations | Good | Excellent (700+) |
| In-Browser Coding | Yes | Yes |
Both use interactive text—no videos. AlgoMonster has more diagrams; Educative has more course variety.
| Educative | AlgoMonster | |
|---|---|---|
| AI Mock Interviews | Yes | No |
| AI Assistant | Yes | Yes |
| Personalized Paths | Yes | No |
Educative wins for AI features—especially AI mock interviews that simulate real conditions.
| Plan | Educative | AlgoMonster |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly | ~$59/mo | N/A |
| Annual | ~$299/yr | ~$89/yr |
| Lifetime | N/A | ~$99-150 |
AlgoMonster is significantly cheaper—especially with lifetime access at ~$99-150.
Educative costs 3x more annually and has no lifetime option.
Choose Educative if you:
Recommended Path:
Choose AlgoMonster if you:
Recommended Path:
If budget allows, combining both is powerful:
This gives you pattern mastery + system design + volume practice.
| Feature | Educative | AlgoMonster |
|---|---|---|
| DSA Patterns | 26 | 48 |
| System Design | Excellent | Limited |
| Pricing | $299/yr | $89/yr or $99-150 lifetime |
| AI Features | Mock interviews | Q&A only |
| Best For | Senior roles | DSA focus |
Which is better for beginners?
AlgoMonster—more focused, cheaper, excellent for DSA foundations.
Which is better for senior interviews?
Educative—system design is essential, and Grokking SD is the best.
Is Educative worth $299/year?
For senior roles needing system design, yes. For pure DSA, AlgoMonster is better value.
Can I skip system design?
For junior/mid-level DSA-focused roles, yes. For senior roles, no.
Bottom line: AlgoMonster for DSA patterns. Educative for system design. Use both if targeting senior FAANG roles.
Good luck!
LeetCopilot is a free browser extension that enhances your LeetCode practice with AI-powered hints, personalized study notes, and realistic mock interviews — all designed to accelerate your coding interview preparation.
Also compatible with Edge, Brave, and Opera