Pricing Note: Product prices mentioned in this article may vary due to promotions, discounts, or updates. Please check the official websites for current pricing.
It's the question every coding interview candidate eventually asks: "Should I pay $199 for AlgoExpert, or just stick to LeetCode?"
A few years ago, AlgoExpert was the clear winner for video explanations. But the landscape in 2025 is very different. YouTube channels like NeetCode have exploded, LeetCode has improved its UI, and AI tools have revolutionized how we debug and learn.
So, is AlgoExpert worth it in 2025?
The short answer: It depends entirely on your learning style. If you need structure and hate hunting for resources, yes. If you're self-motivated and budget-conscious, probably not.
In this review, I'll break down exactly what you get, where it shines, where it falls short, and what alternatives (free and paid) might serve you better.
For a broader framework on how different prep tools serve different stages of your journey, see our complete guide to choosing the right interview prep tool.
AlgoExpert doesn't aim to have every question. It aims to have the right questions. The list covers all major patterns:
The Value: You don't waste time solving "bad" or irrelevant problems. Every question teaches a core concept. This strategies-focused approach is excellent for efficient study.
The Reality Check: While the curation is solid, the categorization can sometimes feel arbitrary. A problem tagged "Arrays" might actually be testing your graph traversal skills. You still need to develop pattern recognition on your own.
Each problem comes with:
This is their flagship feature and the main reason people pay. Clement (the founder) explains the conceptual overview first (often on a whiteboard overlay), then walks through the code line-by-line.
Why it's genuinely good:
Why it's less unique now: Channels like NeetCode now offer similar quality for free. NeetCode's explanations are often more concise (10-15 min vs AlgoExpert's 20-45 min), which some prefer.
The hidden value: The consistency. Every problem has the same production quality. On YouTube, you might find an amazing explanation for Two Sum but a terrible one for Longest Palindromic Substring. AlgoExpert guarantees uniformity.
A dedicated series of videos explaining the basics of complexity analysis, memory, and data structures. Topics include:
The Good: It's comprehensive and well-produced. If you're coming from a non-CS background, this is genuinely helpful.
The Bad: It's arguably basic for a paid product. FreeCodeCamp and MIT OpenCourseWare cover the same material for free, often in more depth.
AlgoExpert provides an integrated coding environment where you can:
Compared to LeetCode: The workspace is cleaner and less cluttered, but it lacks advanced features like the debugger or custom test case creation. It's functional but not groundbreaking.
AlgoExpert has a "Mock Interview" feature, but it's just pairing you with another random user. The experience varies wildly.
The Problems:
Better Alternative: Pramp (free) or Interview Mode on LeetCopilot, which uses AI to simulate a consistent, pedagogical interviewer who can probe your specific weak points.
If you have an interview at Google next week, you want to solve "Google-tagged" questions from the last 6 months. AlgoExpert can't give you that. Their list is static and hasn't been updated with new problem trends.
What you're missing:
LeetCode Premium (or free aggregators) is essential here. This is a dealbreaker if you're in the final round with a specific company.
If your code fails a test case on AlgoExpert, you get a standard error message. In 2025, we expect more. Modern tools should explain why the logic failed, not just show you red text.
What's missing:
The Fix: Using a browser extension like LeetCopilot alongside your practice can give you smart, context-aware hints that AlgoExpert's static platform lacks, helping you unblock yourself without spoiling the solution.
Here's the uncomfortable truth: AlgoExpert is a stepping stone, not a destination. After you finish the 160 questions (which takes most people 2-3 months of consistent practice), you'll need to move to LeetCode anyway.
Why? Because:
So you're paying $199 for what is essentially a "bootcamp" that you'll graduate from. The question is: could you have achieved the same with free resources and more self-discipline?
Let's talk money. AlgoExpert offers several tiers:
AlgoExpert Only: $199/year
SystemsExpert Bundle: $299/year
Full Bundle (AlgoExpert + SystemsExpert + FrontendExpert + MLExpert): $549/year
Scenario 1: You're a bootcamp grad with 3 months to prep
Scenario 2: You're prepping for 6+ months
Scenario 3: You're a working engineer maintaining skills
What AlgoExpert doesn't include:
| Feature | AlgoExpert($199/yr) | LeetCode Premium ($35/mo) | Free (NeetCode + LeetCode) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Question Count | ~200 (Curated) | 3000+ (Vast) | 3000+ (Vast) |
| Video Explanations | Consistent, High Quality | Official Editorials (Hit or Miss) | NeetCode (Excellent) |
| Company Tags | ❌ No | ✅ Yes | ⚠️ Partial (Community Lists) |
| Code Execution | ✅ Integrated | ✅ Integrated | ✅ Integrated |
| Structure | ⭐ Best | ⚠️ Chaotic | ⭐ Good (Blind 75) |
You're a bootcamp grad or self-taught developer who feels overwhelmed by the sheer volume of LeetCode. You need someone to tell you: "Start here, then do this, then that." AlgoExpert excels at creating a clear roadmap.
You learn best from video. Reading text explanations makes your eyes glaze over, but watching someone draw diagrams and talk through the logic clicks instantly.
You have interview anxiety. The polished, beginner-friendly UI reduces cognitive load. There's no "which problem should I do next?" paralysis.
You're comfortable with self-directed learning. If you can follow a GitHub list (like Blind 75) and search YouTube when stuck, you don't need to pay for curation.
You're targeting a specific company. AlgoExpert won't help you with "Meta tagged questions from Q4 2024." You need LeetCode Premium or community aggregators for that.
You want ongoing practice variety. 200 questions is enough to learn patterns, but not enough for long-term maintenance. You'll outgrow it within 2-3 months.
Does AlgoExpert have a free trial?
No, and they are strict about no refunds. This is a major friction point. You have to commit $199 upfront.
Workaround: Some users report success requesting refunds within the first week if they genuinely found the content unhelpful, but this is not official policy. Don't count on it.
Is the System Design bundle worth it?
It's decent for beginners, but for Senior/Staff roles, resources like "Designing Data Intensive Applications" (the DDIA book) or specialized courses on Educative.io are generally deeper.
The SystemsExpert content is good for:
It's NOT good for:
Can I pass FAANG interviews using only AlgoExpert?
Yes, but it's risky. You might miss specific question variations that companies are currently asking. I recommend doing AlgoExpert for the foundation, then shifting to LeetCode for the final 2 weeks of targeted company prep.
Success rate reality check: Most people who land FAANG offers used AlgoExpert as one resource among many, not their sole prep tool.
Is it better than NeetCode?
NeetCode covers the same "curated list" niche for free. AlgoExpert's main advantage over NeetCode now is just the polished, uniform UI. If you don't mind navigating YouTube, NeetCode is the better value.
The honest comparison:
How long does it take to complete AlgoExpert?
Most people fall into the "moderate" category but overestimate their consistency. Plan for 4-6 months realistically.
Can I share an account with a friend to split the cost?
Technically against their terms of service, but enforcement is minimal. However, you lose the ability to save your own solutions and track progress independently. Not recommended.
Do employers care if I used AlgoExpert vs LeetCode?
No. Interviewers care about your problem-solving ability, not which platform you practiced on. Don't put "AlgoExpert Certified" on your resume—it's not a thing.
The trap: You watch Clement's explanation, think "that makes sense," and move on without coding it yourself.
Why it fails: Passive learning creates the illusion of understanding. You need to struggle with the problem first to build real problem-solving muscles.
The fix: Force yourself to attempt every problem for at least 20-30 minutes before watching the video. Even if you don't solve it, the struggle primes your brain to absorb the explanation better.
The trap: You start at problem #1 and work sequentially through the list.
Why it fails: AlgoExpert's ordering doesn't always match a logical learning progression. You might hit a "Very Hard" dynamic programming problem before understanding basic recursion.
The fix: Follow a pattern-based approach. Do all "Two Pointers" problems together, then all "Sliding Window" problems, etc. This builds pattern recognition faster.
The trap: You think "I'm too advanced for Easy problems" and jump straight to Medium/Hard.
Why it fails: AlgoExpert's "Easy" problems often introduce fundamental techniques you'll need for harder problems. Skipping them leaves gaps in your foundation.
The fix: Do at least 70% of the Easy problems, even if they seem trivial. They're quick wins that build confidence and reinforce basics.
The trap: You solve a problem once, mark it complete, and never look at it again.
Why it fails: Spaced repetition is crucial for retention. You'll forget the approach within a week if you don't review.
The fix: Use a spaced repetition schedule:
AlgoExpert doesn't have built-in spaced repetition, so you'll need to track this manually or use a tool like Anki.
The trap: You get the solution working and move on without analyzing Big O.
Why it fails: Interviewers will ask "Can you do better?" and you won't know how to optimize.
The fix: Before watching the video explanation, write down:
Then compare with Clement's analysis. This trains your complexity analysis muscle.
Buy AlgoExpert is worth it if:
Skip AlgoExpert if:
Ultimately, AlgoExpert is a luxury product. It's a very nice ride, but a free bicycle (LeetCode + YouTube) will get you to the same destination if you're willing to pedal a bit harder.
LeetCopilot is a free browser extension that enhances your LeetCode practice with AI-powered hints, personalized study notes, and realistic mock interviews — all designed to accelerate your coding interview preparation.
Also compatible with Edge, Brave, and Opera
Add to Chrome for free